They call her the "milkshake murderer " because she had slipped drugs into her husbands milkshake right before she had murdered him. She had trial in Hong Kong and she had said that she had killed him in self-defense. Also, she had abused drug and alcohol which had made her a very violent person. She demanded a retrial and felt life in prison wasn't fair for her defending herself. I feel that it's ridiculous that she gets a retrial after there is evidence that she had slipped drugs into his milkshake. Why would anyone do that to defend themselves? It also states in the article that when she abused drugs and alcohol she became more violent. Maybe he was trying to defend himself rather than the other way around. What I also don't get is if she killed her husband in self-defense then why did she hide his body in their storeroom ( wrapped in towels, in a sleeping bag, and rolled up in a carpet.) Why didn't she call the police to tell them that she had killed him because she was trying to defend herself. My opinion, retrial=she's COMPLETELY guilty.
"MilkShake Murderer!"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment